Jira Review – How does Jira stack up?

Jira is an effective tool for managing work and tasks in software development. It has a wide range of features which make it extremely useful. But its steep learning curve, high price tag, and outdated UI can turn away some potential users. What are your options for those who decide to invest the time required to learn how Jira works well with their business needs? Jira is a web-based application that helps you to manage your projects. Atlassian developed Jira, a project management software solution. Jira was created to support software development teams track bugs. While it hasn’t lost sight of its beginnings, it has grown into a generic project management tool, but it’s still quite popular among firms working on software and app development projects. Teams and organizations may use Jira to plan out a set of activities needed to accomplish a task. Jira provides many collaboration tools that help members of your Teamwork more efficient. Kanban and Scrum are two joint planning approaches supported by Jira. This allows Jira users to personalize the software interface to fit the work they’re performing correctly. Jira compares well to the finest project management software. As we said in our Jira review, we feel Jira’s capabilities are best suited for businesses that need to finish projects linearly. A few critical stuff, like budget monitoring, are absent from Jira. Other project management software programs may be more appropriate depending on the firm’s demands. There is no one-size-fits-all solution for this sort of software, as there is with most of it. Consider the features you’ll need to handle the many kinds of projects your group works on. Jira will be helpful if it meets specific characteristics. Other packages will function better if Jira doesn’t fully meet the group’s requirements.

Pros and Cons of Jira

Pros

  • Dashboards that can be customized
  • Tools for advanced security
  • Excellent user interface
  • Provides two planning methodologies to choose from.
  • Powerful administration tools
  • Excellent search capabilities
  • Workflow for app development is fantastic.
  • Works well with tasks that are organized in a logical order.
  • Excellent report-generating capability
  • Newcomers will see a lot of popup assistance windows.

Cons

  • Frequently requires a steep learning curve
  • There is no live chat available.
  • The page hierarchy may grow cumbersome.
  • Overly reliant on plug-ins
  • Others have more freedom than you.

Jira-Review-8211-How-does-Jira-stack-up

How does Jira stack up against the best project management software?

Jira’s comprehensive feature set and price levels are ideal for software and app development projects and projects with a sequential pattern from start to finish. Jira excels in report production and allows users to choose the interface that best suits the sort of work that the company undertakes. On the other hand, projects that need flexibility and creativity to go-ahead may be better served by a software package other than Jira.

The following are our top picks for the finest project management software:

  • Zoho Projects, a fantastic all-around project management software package, gives the most amazing balance of features, robust tools, and connections with widespread applications.
  • Wrike is a project management tool that provides marketing firms with the freedom to change the project scope, activities, and timeframe on the go.
  • Favro is a project management tool for small businesses that prioritize agility above everything else since team members are typically required to undertake various duties.

1633229719_548_Jira-Review-8211-How-does-Jira-stack-up

Project Complexity in Jira

Jira’s origins are in software development; thus, it’s particularly good at breaking down big projects into smaller tasks. Jira allows businesses to build up these activities in a logical order, taking the project from start to finish clearly and logically. As issues develop along the route, Jira streamlines creating tickets to address the issue before going on to the next step. Jira may not be ideal for projects with tasks that do not have an apparent sequential movement. LiquidPlanner is a better solution for complicated goods with several phases and substeps to finish. It can accommodate many contributors, bringing together teams that may need to work individually or cooperatively on a project. LiquidPlanner provides the agility necessary to complete complicated projects for many prominent firms, yet Jira can’t quite match it.

Jira’s Workforce

Jira’s Free tier includes several functional capabilities for teams of less than ten persons working on a project. For minor projects, organizations may be able to utilize the Free version. Jira can scale up to suit the demands of more prominent organizations. It comes with a comprehensive set of administrative features that enable the project manager to watch each team member’s job closely. Jira’s Standard price tier is ideal for expanding teams, while the Premium tier adds a few more tracking functions and gives administrators more project management options above the Standard level. Jira compares well to the best software packages regarding the number of users it can effectively handle in a given project. For modest tasks, the Free edition outperforms its competitors.

1633229720_190_Jira-Review-8211-How-does-Jira-stack-up

Jira’s Usability

Those new to Jira and project management software will need to devote some time to learn how to utilize it. Jira does an excellent job of bringing users through the basic setup procedure so that newcomers can get up and running quickly. However, taking full use of the software’s complex and most potent capabilities will take some time to become used to. As part of the setup process, users will have to choose which interface they want to use; therefore, it’s good to learn about each interface’s advantages and disadvantages. Jira will be reasonably simple to use after the setup procedure is complete for folks who are acquainted with other project management software products. Its workflow management approach is comparable to different programs to provide few challenges to experienced users. Jira provides several popup windows for novices to assist as they navigate the program. Beginners to the program may read through the tips to learn about the many features. Experienced users can remove these popup windows instantly, while newcomers to the software can read through the advice to learn about the various functions. To understand how Jira operates, we suggest using the Free tier or a free trial of the Standard or Premium tier, as with other project management software programs. Hands-on practice is the best method to see whether the interface will be user-friendly for your company.

1633229721_437_Jira-Review-8211-How-does-Jira-stack-up

Jira’s Highlights

Jira’s most significant features are task prioritization and scheduling. Jira’s capabilities are excellent for individuals who require assistance managing a project from inception to end linearly and sequentially.

Scheduling

Jira assists the project manager in establishing a timetable for the entire project and the specific tasks necessary along the route in the early stages. As a result, the project manager can plan out the whole project and create and allocate tasks. In addition, Jira offers a time monitoring function that allows project participants to observe whether sections of the project are taking longer than they should or whether some activities took less time than expected, freeing up certain team members to assist in other areas.

Progress Monitoring

Jira lets team members track the progress of each job as it is completed. However, the program lacks a checklist function, which would help provide a visual reminder of the project’s remaining phases. Jira’s tracking tools make it easy for project managers to know which team members have some spare time in their schedules to help with a particular aspect of the project.

Creating Reports

The ability to produce several reports is a welcome discovery inside the Jira program. Jira shines in this area for people who want to view project progress using graphs. Jira makes report creation easier by offering a variety of report templates. Users merely need to choose a template, and the program will fill it with the necessary information. Wrike is a project management software package that gives a little more freedom than Jira for organizations that require powerful real-time reporting tools but need a project management software product that offers a bit more flexibility than Jira. It provides report-generating solid functions in a suitable solution for marketing and collaborative tasks.

Feature Comparison

Jira’s feature set is robust for the correct projects, but it falls short in a few key areas. Jira, for example, cannot monitor project budgets and costs. Jira users will need to utilize a different project management software product to handle the finance component of any project. LiquidPlanner, a competitor application, includes excellent capabilities for managing budgets and project expenditures. On the other hand, Zoho Projects is the most feature-rich project management software. It has a diverse set of capabilities that can manage both complicated and basic tasks. It has a comprehensive time tracking tool that enables the administrator to keep track of project time, including billable and non-billable hours spent. Wrike is another software package with a lot of features. We like how Wrike allows customers to add other capabilities for an additional fee, much like an ala carte setup. Those with simple requirements may stay on the base plan without extra charges. This adaptability is beneficial to a wide variety of businesses.

1633229722_244_Jira-Review-8211-How-does-Jira-stack-up

Jira’s Cost

Jira used to have some strange pricing levels, giving a flat charge for a particular range of users, which made it quite a value compared to its competitors in some instances. On the other hand, Jira has transitioned to a widely recognized per-user, per-month subscription model in recent years. As a result, Jira’s price structure is now much more comparable to most of the finest project management tools. Jira’s pricing tiers are similar to its competitors, so businesses that enjoy Jira’s functionality and usability will get a decent deal. Those firms who want capabilities that Jira does not provide will resist the temptation to purchase Jira since it is so much less expensive than rivals.

Optional Pricing Tiers

The following price levels are available:

  • The free edition is limited to ten users. The Free tier’s features are pretty comparable to those available in the paid versions of the program for end-users. Still, it lacks the administrative capabilities offered in the paid levels.
  • Standard: For up to 10,000 users, the Standard edition costs $7 per month per user. It has comprehensive administration capabilities, such as rights management, and advanced security features, such as audit logs. In addition, it offers professional customer help during business hours, while the Free version solely provides community support.
  • Premium: For up to 10,000 members, the Premium edition costs $14 per user each month. Premium adds project archiving features, 24/7 customer support, and administrative insights to the Standard edition. In addition, the Premium version provides limitless cloud storage for data, but the Standard version is restricted to 250 GB.
  • Enterprise: The Enterprise edition is designed for businesses that need high protection and have a worldwide presence. It enables an infinite number of sites to be connected to Jira, while the Premium version only allows for one. In addition, Atlassian will provide a unique pricing option to users of the Enterprise edition.

Non-profit organizations get a considerable discount from Jira. For enterprises that prefer an on-premises option versus a cloud service, Jira also offers an on-premises solution. To utilize the on-premises service, companies will require at least 500 users.

Other Packages to Think About in Terms of Cost

We prefer Favro, which includes various features targeted at giving flexibility, for individuals with small teams that desire a reasonable price tier. We recommend TeamGantt to prominent couples seeking a more affordable option than Jira. For large groups, it has some attractive price points.

1633229723_514_Jira-Review-8211-How-does-Jira-stack-up

The Jira User Interface

Jira’s user interface has seen a significant overhaul in the last several years, so it’s worth a second look for people who tried it before and didn’t like it. One of Jira’s best features is choosing from various templates, enabling users to customize the interface to fit the template. However, you must first understand how each template works to get the most out of the Jira software. Jira gives descriptions of each template when users choose one, which is quite helpful. However, some users may need further research to fully comprehend what they’re picking to get the most out of the program.

The following are some of Jira’s choices for choosing planning methodologies:

  • Kanban: Jira’s Kanban interface enables team members to take on any of the project’s numerous responsibilities. If one of the team members needs assistance with a task, others may step in and assist as required. Because the Kanban interface is flexible, changes may arise throughout the project.
  • Scrum: Jira’s Scrum interface assigns a specific responsibility to each team member. The administrator will define the objectives and timetables, and the team members will strive to achieve them. Therefore, changes to the timetable and project deliverables are unusual in the Scrum interface.

Jira features a mobile app and a desktop program so that users may stay in contact with team members about the project at all times. Zoho Projects and Favro are two more project management software packages with great mobile applications. We also like both Zoho Projects and Favro’s overall user interfaces in their desktop editions.

1633229724_720_Jira-Review-8211-How-does-Jira-stack-up

Collaboration with Jira

Jira’s collaborative tools are mainly concerned with monitoring talks and messages about the project’s competitiveness rather than actual, real-time collaboration. Jira does not have a live chat feature, although it does enable users to send each other messages. Users may submit suggestions for modifications to many elements of the project. Jira’s file sharing and document storage features allow users to save all of the project’s critical documents in one location, making collaboration easier. Although Jira offers a good set of tools in this area, Teamwork is a better project management software package for allowing small businesses and groups to collaborate on projects as if they were in the same room. In addition, it has an integrated chat component that improves cooperation on a variety of tasks.

Conclusion

Although Jira may be used in almost any project management circumstance, it excels at projects with a linear and sequential workflow. Jira is used by software developers and app developers daily and has been for a long time, so it’s no surprise that Jira’s capabilities are well-suited to these projects. On the other hand, Jira’s rivals, many of which emphasize adaptability, may be a better fit for projects that don’t follow a linear pattern and need a lot of flexibility in project management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Stack does JIRA use?

A: JIRA uses a Python stack.

Why is JIRA not suitable for project management?

A: JIRA is not suitable for project management because it lacks features that are needed, such as a ticketing system and task dependencies.

Related Tags

  • Jira vs. asana
  • Jira competitors Gartner
  • Azure DevOps vs. Jira pricing
  • Jira vs. Azure DevOps
  • Jira alternatives free